Pairwise support maximization methods to exploit valued outranking relations in ranking problems
نویسندگان
چکیده
Many outranking methods involve two steps. First, the alternatives are compared pairwise to build a valued outranking relation; this relation is then exploited to derive a recommendation for the decision maker. We present three related exploitation models providing three types of solutions, depending on the decision maker’s request: a linear order, a weak order, or a weak partial order. Each solution is evaluated by computing the support for the pairwise comparisons it implies. This comparison may be based on the minimum support present in the solution (prudence principle), the lexicographically minimum support, or the sum of the supports. Relations between these models and some of their properties are discussed and illustrated using data sets found in the literature.
منابع مشابه
The integration of valued outranking relations in ELECTRE methods for ranking problem
The ELECTRE family of decision aid methods are well-known approaches in the field of multiple criteria decision aiding (MCDA). Different ELECTRE methods can be used for choice problem, ranking problem and sorting problem respectively. These methods are characterized by outranking relations and exploitation procedures. Different definitions of the outranking relations result in the difference of...
متن کاملMultiple criteria ranking and choice with all compatible minimal cover sets of decision rules
We introduce a new multiple criteria ranking/choice method that applies Dominance-based Rough Set Approach (DRSA) and represents the Decision Maker’s (DM’s) preferences with decision rules. The DM provides a set of pairwise comparisons indicating whether an outranking (weak preference) relation should hold for some pairs of reference alternatives. This preference information is structured using...
متن کاملExploitation of a Rough Approximation of the Outranking Relation in Multicriteria Choice and Ranking
Given a finite set A of actions evaluated by a family of criteria, we consider a preferential information in the form of a pairwise comparison table (PCT) including pairs of actions from a subset B⊆A×A described by graded preference relations on particular criteria and a comprehensive outranking relation. Using the rough set approach to the analysis of the PCT, we obtain a rough approximation o...
متن کاملBipolar ranking from pairwise fuzzy outrankings
In this paper we propose to apply the concept of L-valued kernels (see Bisdorff & Roubens [3, 4]) to the problem of constructing a global ranking from a pairwise L-valued outranking relation defined on a set of decision alternatives as encountered in the fuzzy preference modelling context (see Roy & Bouyssou [11] for instance). Our approach is based on a repetitive selection of best and worst c...
متن کاملOutranking Methods As Tools in Strategic Natural Resources Planning
Two outranking methods, ELECTRE III and PROMETHEE II, commonly used as decision-aid in various environmental problems, and their applications to decision support for natural resources management are presented. These methods represent ‘the European school’ of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM), as opposed to ‘the American school’, represented by, for instance, the AHP method. On the basis of ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007